Use case
For arbitrators
Rule on the full record — cut through thousands of pages to the decisive documents, with every finding traced back to its source.
Arbitrators are handed thousands of pages of contemporaneous records, often as the parties' selectively curated bundles. Forming an independent view means reading what actually happened — not only what each side chose to put forward.
Kritical ingests the full record, classifies every document, and lets you search across all of it — with every finding linked to its source document, page, and quote — so your reasoning rests on the complete picture rather than a party's selection.
Why Kritical
The complete record
Search the entire document set, not just the bundles the parties chose to surface.
Every finding cited
Each answer links to its source document, page, and quote — ready to stand behind in the award.
Thousands of pages in minutes
Locate the decisive correspondence, instruction, or programme without manual trawling.
Where Kritical fits
The strongest use is reconstructing the sequence of events and testing each party's account against the contemporaneous record — finding the letter, instruction, or programme that confirms or contradicts a position.
Because every finding cites the document and page it came from, the system supports your independent judgment instead of replacing it — the evidence behind any conclusion is always one click away.
Frequently asked questions
- How do I know a finding is accurate and not invented?
- Every finding links back to its source document, page, and quote. Nothing is asserted without a citation you can open and verify, so your reasoning rests on the record rather than on an unsupported summary.
- Can it work across the parties' full submissions?
- Yes. Kritical ingests and classifies the entire document set — not just the curated bundles — so you can search the complete record and form an independent view of what actually happened.
Adjudicating on a document-heavy dispute? We should talk.
Book a demo